<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fashion 2.0 &#124; Digital IQ Ranking of Fashion Brands&#8217; Digital Competence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.businessoffashion.com/2009/09/fashion-2-0-digital-iq-ranking-of-fashion-brands-digital-competence.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.businessoffashion.com/2009/09/fashion-2-0-digital-iq-ranking-of-fashion-brands-digital-competence.html</link>
	<description>The Business of Fashion is an essential daily resource for fashion creatives, business professionals and entrepreneurs in more than 200 countries around the world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:49:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fashion Victim</title>
		<link>http://www.businessoffashion.com/2009/09/fashion-2-0-digital-iq-ranking-of-fashion-brands-digital-competence.html#comment-45687</link>
		<dc:creator>Fashion Victim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 07:23:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businessoffashion.com/?p=6708#comment-45687</guid>
		<description>What were the metrics used to rate the site? Any ideas? Can the Editor comment please? Thank you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What were the metrics used to rate the site? Any ideas? Can the Editor comment please? Thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: farahbutt</title>
		<link>http://www.businessoffashion.com/2009/09/fashion-2-0-digital-iq-ranking-of-fashion-brands-digital-competence.html#comment-25997</link>
		<dc:creator>farahbutt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 07:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businessoffashion.com/?p=6708#comment-25997</guid>
		<description>It is really surprising to know Ralph is ranked 2. Nice one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is really surprising to know Ralph is ranked 2. Nice one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hampry</title>
		<link>http://www.businessoffashion.com/2009/09/fashion-2-0-digital-iq-ranking-of-fashion-brands-digital-competence.html#comment-14559</link>
		<dc:creator>Hampry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 14:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businessoffashion.com/?p=6708#comment-14559</guid>
		<description>In the first-ever ‘Digital IQ’ ranking of the top luxury fashion brands’ ...... really to day more people use it.Top ten fashion website use it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the first-ever ‘Digital IQ’ ranking of the top luxury fashion brands’ &#8230;&#8230; really to day more people use it.Top ten fashion website use it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danielle</title>
		<link>http://www.businessoffashion.com/2009/09/fashion-2-0-digital-iq-ranking-of-fashion-brands-digital-competence.html#comment-14483</link>
		<dc:creator>Danielle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businessoffashion.com/?p=6708#comment-14483</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll be honest, this study reeks of rubbish. Simply go type in a few of these companies names into a search engine and see how savvy these guys really are. You&#039;re talking about social campaigns and most of these don&#039;t even cover off on the basics of SEM.  I&#039;d love, love to see the methodology behinds this. I’m imagining a very fancy dartboard, gilded in gold.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll be honest, this study reeks of rubbish. Simply go type in a few of these companies names into a search engine and see how savvy these guys really are. You&#8217;re talking about social campaigns and most of these don&#8217;t even cover off on the basics of SEM.  I&#8217;d love, love to see the methodology behinds this. I’m imagining a very fancy dartboard, gilded in gold.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dahlia</title>
		<link>http://www.businessoffashion.com/2009/09/fashion-2-0-digital-iq-ranking-of-fashion-brands-digital-competence.html#comment-13682</link>
		<dc:creator>Dahlia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 16:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businessoffashion.com/?p=6708#comment-13682</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not surprised LV tops the fashion list as most competent in the new media. They&#039;re going to be streaming their show live on Facebook (of all places!) as I read their tweet just now. 

If only most brands had that kind of new media awareness and try to harness that to their advantage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not surprised LV tops the fashion list as most competent in the new media. They&#8217;re going to be streaming their show live on Facebook (of all places!) as I read their tweet just now. </p>
<p>If only most brands had that kind of new media awareness and try to harness that to their advantage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ari @ World on a Hanger</title>
		<link>http://www.businessoffashion.com/2009/09/fashion-2-0-digital-iq-ranking-of-fashion-brands-digital-competence.html#comment-13592</link>
		<dc:creator>Ari @ World on a Hanger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businessoffashion.com/?p=6708#comment-13592</guid>
		<description>I wonder how the new Burberry social network will influence its ranking.

See this article from Draper&#039;s for more info:

http://www.drapersonline.com/news/womenswear/news/burberry-to-launch-social-networking-site/5006311.article</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder how the new Burberry social network will influence its ranking.</p>
<p>See this article from Draper&#8217;s for more info:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.drapersonline.com/news/womenswear/news/burberry-to-launch-social-networking-site/5006311.article" rel="nofollow">http://www.drapersonline.com/news/womenswear/news/burberry-to-launch-social-networking-site/5006311.article</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fashion</title>
		<link>http://www.businessoffashion.com/2009/09/fashion-2-0-digital-iq-ranking-of-fashion-brands-digital-competence.html#comment-13580</link>
		<dc:creator>fashion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 07:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businessoffashion.com/?p=6708#comment-13580</guid>
		<description>It is really surprising to know Ralph is ranked 2. Nice one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is really surprising to know Ralph is ranked 2. Nice one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

