The Bottom Line | Pinterest vs. Facebook

Pinterest vs Facebook | Source:

LONDON, United Kingdom — It’s now common knowledge that social curation site Pinterest — which attracted its first 10 million users faster than any other website in history — is the fastest growing social platform today, with 18.7 million users as of March, according to comScore. But what does this mean for social giant Facebook, fashion businesses and the bottom line?

According to research provided exclusively to BoF, it turns out that the answers to these questions are mixed. A case study by online boutique shows that Pinterest users buy and spend more than their Facebook counterparts, but that their levels of engagement are considerably lower.

London-based Boticca is a curated online marketplace that specialises in accessories and jewelry. Founded by Kiyan Foroughi and Avid Larizadeh, the company was early to integrate Pinterest across its website, a move that has already paid off. Indeed, in the last month, Pinterest has become the site’s primary social media driver in terms of sales, begging the question: when it comes to social commerce, which is the bigger player: Facebook or Pinterest?

According to the Boticca study, based on data that was gathered last month, Pinterest drives more sales than Facebook and attracts more new users. The results show that 10 percent of all transactions came from users who arrived at the site via Pinterest, compared to 7 percent for Facebook. And while 86 percent of users who came via Pinterest were visiting Boticca for the first time, only 57 percent of traffic from Facebook was composed of new users. The numbers also indicated that Pinterest users are willing to spend more than their Facebook counterparts. Indeed, their purchases totaled more than twice as much on average per transaction.

Facebook channels a more captive audience, however. According to the Boticca data, Pinterest users spend 65 percent less time on the retailer’s website than those that come from Facebook and 70 percent less than the site’s average. Not surprisingly, the Pinterest bounce rate is higher as well – 43 percent more than Facebook – and conversion rates are the lowest of any channel.

So what accounts for these behaviours?

With its highly visual mood boards and social curation model, Pinterest is all about discovery and replicates an experience similar to window-shopping. Popular categories on the site, like home decor, mens and womens apparel, and food and drink have become powerful places for brands to contextualise their products and build awareness through recommendations. Furthermore, Pinterest’s simplified navigation tools and seamless product links make it easy to convert ‘pins’ into sales. But an average of only 14.2 minutes per visit per user shows that Pinterest traffic is more ephemeral and users are less likely to linger on a product.

Facebook on the other hand has a much more engaged audience. Users browsing company pages interact with the brand in a more controlled setting, exploring layers of products, promotions and marketing material. And Facebook users take their time. A recent comScore study on Pinterest indicates that average time on site per visitor hit about 98 minutes per month in January of 2012. But in comparison, Facebook users currently spend about 7 hours per month on the platform. And with more than 900 million users, the Facebook opportunity is massive in terms of sheer scale.

So why have businesses been so hesitant to embrace so-called ‘F-Commerce’, enabling users to shop directly from the Facebook platform? After the launch of much buzzed about experiments in F-Commerce, many high profile retailers have begun to retreat. Indeed, brands like Gap, JCPenny and Nordstrom shuttered their Facebook storefronts last year. In an interview with Bloomberg, Sucharita Mulpuru, an analyst at Forrester Research, commented: “There was a lot of anticipation that Facebook would turn into a new destination, a store, a place where people would shop. But it was like trying to sell stuff to people while they’re hanging out with their friends at the bar.”

It would seem that while Facebook users turn to the platform primarily for conversation and personal connection, in contrast, the mindset of typical Pinterest users is much more geared towards browsing products and, ultimately, shopping.

The Bottom Line

Pinterest appears to be outpacing Facebook in the social commerce race. This is due in part to the way that people experience Pinterest, the nature of the content it features, and the power of its tastemakers. But Facebook isn’t out of the game yet. With its extensive network and unparalleled level of user engagement, Facebook remains one of the most powerful marketing opportunities available. If Facebook is able to recalibrate its F-Commerce model and entice users to shop in the same place where they “hang out with their friends at the bar,” they may be able to convert the social network into a solid consumer base.

Related Articles

Post a Comment


  1. Cool study! Thanks for sharing. It makes perfect sense that Pinterest would drive more shopping traffic than Facebook. When I’m on Facebook I’m there to check up on my friends’ & family’s latest news and see what my favorite brands are up to. But on Pinterest I categorize things I’d like to buy based off a particular interest. Plus everyone I follow on Pinterest usually shares items that I can buy as well. Pinterest is just more shopping oriented overall because it visually showcases the best items from brands that encourages me to buy. I just don’t see Facebook as a place that makes me want to buy; Facebook is about connecting not commerce.

  2. I think this article is really interesting and helpful, specially for people who analyze fashion brands and the way they approach their customers in digital media. I will like to see a study like this but referring to the customers preference for pinterest and facebook, comparing them between different regions in the world.

  3. Pinterest appeals to visual people, it is in fact an exercise in visual expression. I think it is a natural fit for the consumer, explore different styles and genres and then translate that social interaction into their own lives, update the contents of their wardrobe or living room or house extension.

  4. Thanks for sharing. As a Facebook advertiser we are enjoying, at the moment, a relatively cheaper experience than Google. It will be interesting to see how Pinterest goes about getting revenue and the impact that will have on users.

    facebook_jennifer.regan.167 from Sydney, New South Wales, Australia