LONDON, United Kingdom — Despite the rise of social media, which has put more and more power in the hands of consumers, a senior executive at a major fashion brand recently said to me that, in this industry, “the creative director is God.”
While I don’t agree with the idea of the all-powerful, all-knowing creative director, issuing pronouncements from an ivory-tower, one thing remains clear: despite the digitalisation, and consequent democratisation, of the fashion industry, having a strong creative director at the helm of a brand is perhaps more important than ever before, made all the more clear by three bits of news in the fashion ether this week.
On Monday, Mulberry confirmed that it was set to part ways with Emma Hill, the brand’s creative director, who along with Stuart Vevers before her, helped to put Mulberry on the fashion map with of-the-moment bags like the Alexa and Del Rey. Following the announcement, shares in Mulberry dropped as much as 9 percent, closing down almost 6 percent by the end of Monday, and have creeped even lower in the last couple of days.
That the publicly-traded company suffered a significant loss in market capitalisation following the surprise announcement suggests that even the equity analysts in the City and on Wall Street recognise that a fashion business without a clear creative point of view is doomed.
Insiders are saying that Hill had differences over creative and operational strategy with Mulberry management, industry-speak for a breakdown in the relationship between the creative and business sides of the brand. It’s a pattern I have seen over and over again, especially when a brand is under financial pressure. Indeed, Mulberry shares have plummeted in recent months as the company issued two profit warnings indicating that it was struggling to maintain its once meteoric growth.
But it is precisely at challenging times like these when clear creative vision matters most and when business people need to support and empower their creatives so the business can make it through the tough times.
Unfortunately, many business managers in fashion — and I have spoken to many of them myself over the past few years — often expect an overnight turnaround. Remember the revolving doors at Ungaro, or Vionnet, or Chloé? Building a strong creative point of view takes time and discipline, and changes don’t manifest themselves overnight.
Hopefully the executives over at Hugo Boss will give Jason Wu, the Taiwanese-American wunderkind, time to make his mark, following this week’s announcement that the designer will take the creative helm at BOSS, the company’s primary women’s ready-to-wear and accessory line. BOSS is the perfect example of a large, global fashion brand that nobody really pays much attention to because it’s had nothing new or interesting to say, particularly in womenswear, which has mostly existed in the shadows of the company’s core menswear tailoring business. With a show planned for New York Fashion Week, next February, and some young creative talent to give it a boost, BOSS now has a fighting chance of getting back on the global fashion radar.
And then, there are powerful brands, with strong track records, that nonetheless need creative renewal. Even with a proven creative talent like Reed Krakoff, who has led the creative re-invention of Coach for 16 years, it appears that it’s time for him to step down and allow someone else to bring new creative energy to the brand, which has also been aiming to expand further into the ready-to-wear business. Perhaps it’s not surprising (if a bit far-fetched) that the name of Marc Jacobs has been suggested for the Coach role. According to industry speculation, which has been swirling since earlier this year, Jacobs may be set to exit Louis Vuitton (supposedly leaving room for Nicolas Ghesquière to make his long-awaited next move) as his contract is up for renewal this year.
In an interesting twist, Jacobs and his business partner Robert Duffy revealed last week that they have, for the first time, publicly named Katie Hillier and Luella Bartley in top creative roles at Jacobs’ lower-priced Marc by Marc Jacobs line, which is widely seen as the most promising vehicle for future growth of Jacobs’ business. WWD went as far to speculate that Duffy and Jacobs may be looking to follow in the footsteps of Michael Kors with the kind of blockbuster IPO that has had financial investors clamouring for more high-growth, globally-recognised fashion businesses.
The vast majority of Marc Jacobs’ operating business is currently owned by LVMH, so such a move would be much more complicated than it may seem. Still, it’s clear that even Jacobs and Duffy recognise that having a figurehead creative director for Marc by Marc was no longer enough.