The Business of Fashion
Agenda-setting intelligence, analysis and advice for the global fashion community.
Agenda-setting intelligence, analysis and advice for the global fashion community.
NEW YORK, United States — When Target Corp.'s website went offline early Sunday morning, under pressure from the demand for its Lilly Pulitzer capsule collection, and its stores were quickly picked bare by frenzied shoppers, consumers were frustrated. The company issued an apology. "We realize there is an extreme amount of excitement around this collaboration, and we apologize for any disappointment this may have caused," it said.
As the company’s spin suggests, the incident wasn’t all bad. Target’s designer collections aren’t primarily about moving goods. They’re about generating buzz that makes the retailer seem cool.
Like a similar incident in 2011 with a Missoni collection, the Lilly Pulitzer chaos — Lucky called it “Shopageddon” — may reflect badly on the company's IT department, but it makes Target’s merchandising look savvy. “One photo after another shows monster lines, gutted racks and display cases, and hordes of women fighting over these pastel-colored pieces like they’re Furbies and it’s 1998 all over again,” wrote Lucky’s Emily Kirkpatrick.
The frenzy highlights another aspect of Target’s designer collaborations: Like many a hot initial public offering, they’re priced below market, fueling speculative fever.
ADVERTISEMENT
An EBay search for “Lilly Pulitzer Target” currently turns up more than 30,000 items, suggesting that many of the people hitting Target’s servers and stores weren’t bargain-hunting fashionistas. They were professionals hoping to flip the resort- themed apparel to people with more money than patience or tech skills — the apparel version of concert ticket scalpers.
These speculators are taking a risk, of course. The merchandise may be less enticing at higher prices without the excitement of the release publicity. After all, even the hottest IPO prices sometimes come crashing down.
By Virginia Postrel; editor: Zara Kessler.
Nordstrom, Tod’s and L’Occitane are all pushing for privatisation. Ultimately, their fate will not be determined by whether they are under the scrutiny of public investors.
The company is in talks with potential investors after filing for insolvency in Europe and closing its US stores. Insiders say efforts to restore the brand to its 1980s heyday clashed with its owners’ desire to quickly juice sales in order to attract a buyer.
The humble trainer, once the reserve of football fans, Britpop kids and the odd skateboarder, has become as ubiquitous as battered Converse All Stars in the 00s indie sleaze years.
Manhattanites had little love for the $25 billion megaproject when it opened five years ago (the pandemic lockdowns didn't help, either). But a constantly shifting mix of stores, restaurants and experiences is now drawing large numbers of both locals and tourists.