Skip to main content
BoF Logo

The Business of Fashion

Agenda-setting intelligence, analysis and advice for the global fashion community.

Allbirds’ Quest to Make Zero-Carbon Shoes

The company cut the average carbon footprint of its products by 12 percent last year, not yet enough to offset the impact of growth.
A woman sits smiling with her eyes closed on a patch of grass surrounded by bushes. She is wearing a white sleeveless top, brown skirt and white sneakers. She is reaching towards her feet and resting her head on her arms.
Allbirds has set a goal to reduce the carbon footprint of its products to near zero by the end of the decade. (Allbirds)

“People don’t buy sustainable products,” said Allbirds co-chief executive Tim Brown. “They buy great products.” The company’s goal is to prove its products can be both.

By the end of the decade, the San Francisco-based footwear brand aims to reduce the average carbon footprint of its shoes to near zero, slashing emissions even as it grows.

It’s not there yet. Last year, the company brought down the average footprint of each product by 12 percent, but its overall carbon emissions rose nearly 50 percent as the business expanded, according to an impact update published Friday.

This year, Allbirds expects to shave another 6 percent from its average product footprint, but it said these incremental reductions are expected to become more substantial from 2023 as ongoing efforts to shift the materials it uses start to pay off. By 2025, the company said it expects to begin decoupling growth from impact.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We have to bend the line,” said Brown. “The next few years are really critical.”

But revamping products costs money and the company’s ambitions are running up against an increasingly challenging economic landscape, as rising inflation and an uncertain economic outlook curb consumer spending.

Allbirds’ share price has plummeted nearly 90 percent since it went public in November last year amid a broader market sell-off. In August, the company downgraded its outlook for the year and announced cost-cutting measures, including reducing its corporate workforce by eight percent.

“It’s been a rough time for sure, and the absolute worst conclusion from the last 12 months is that purpose doesn’t matter,” said Brown. “But for the businesses that crack the code here, there’s enormous consumer and financial reward.”

Cutting emissions and cutting costs aren’t incompatible, according to Allbirds. Among the steps it laid out in August are efforts to transition to automated distribution centres in the US and accelerate efforts to reduce logistics and product costs.

“There’s myth busting to be done that sustainability always costs more,” said Allbirds sustainability head Hana Kajimura. “It does sometimes certainly, if you’re going to invest in novel materials, but... ocean shipping or using less materials, being more efficient, minimising waste, [these things] save money.”

As the company looks to accelerate its ambitions in the coming years, it may prove harder to strike the balance between spending and impact.

Last year’s reduction in the company’s average product footprint rested almost entirely on a small increase in the number of products shipped by sea instead of air, an effort to shift most of the company’s operations to renewable energy and a programme to buy renewable energy credits to essentially offset the impact of manufacturing.

ADVERTISEMENT

Those moves were ”low-hanging fruit, the things we could do immediately,” said Kajimura. This year’s 6 percent target relies on dozens of different projects intended to incrementally keep driving the company’s footprint lower in areas from packaging to logistics.

Going forward, it’s expecting to start to bank returns on a long-term effort to shift its wool supply chain to regenerative practices, but it also still needs to figure out gnarly challenges like finding natural materials that perform as well as synthetic shoe components and working with suppliers to really decarbonise the supply chain.

“It’s becoming clearer and clearer that the work we have to do is around trying to make ourselves bigger and shifting whole systems, whether [through] policy work or teaming up with other companies that are much bigger than us,” said Kajimura.

Further Reading
About the author
Sarah Kent
Sarah Kent

Sarah Kent is Chief Sustainability Correspondent at The Business of Fashion. She is based in London and drives BoF's coverage of critical environmental and labour issues.

In This Article
People
Organisations

© 2024 The Business of Fashion. All rights reserved. For more information read our Terms & Conditions

More from Sustainability
How fashion can do better for people and the planet.

Fashion’s Virgin Plastic Problem

The industry needs to ditch its reliance on fossil-fuel-based materials like polyester in order to meet climate targets, according to a new report from Textile Exchange.


Are H&M and Zara Harming Forests in Brazil?

Cotton linked to environmental and human rights abuses in Brazil is leaking into the supply chains of major fashion brands, a new investigation has found, prompting Zara-owner Inditex to send a scathing rebuke to the industry’s biggest sustainable cotton certifier.


view more

Subscribe to the BoF Daily Digest

The essential daily round-up of fashion news, analysis, and breaking news alerts.

The Business of Fashion

Agenda-setting intelligence, analysis and advice for the global fashion community.
CONNECT WITH US ON
The Business of Beauty Global Awards - Deadline 30 April 2024
© 2024 The Business of Fashion. All rights reserved. For more information read our Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy, Cookie Policy and Accessibility Statement.
The Business of Beauty Global Awards - Deadline 30 April 2024