The Business of Fashion
Agenda-setting intelligence, analysis and advice for the global fashion community.
Agenda-setting intelligence, analysis and advice for the global fashion community.
Want to be more sustainable? Consider Black Friday off the table.
The mega-shopping moment (a discount-driven start to the holiday sales period that now spans a whole weekend) is designed to encourage consumption on a scale that’s “totally incompatible” with efforts to avert climate catastrophe, according to Andrew Simms, founder of climate research and campaign group the Rapid Transition Alliance.
In fact, limiting global warming will require the richest shoppers in wealthy countries like the UK, US and Japan to buy an average of just five new garments per year by 2030, according to a new report co-authored by the organisation.
And yet Black Friday has become a major marketing moment for brands that say they stand against everything it represents, with sustainability-minded businesses adopting clever marketing tactics to tap into the holiday without condoning it.
Outdoors brand Patagonia famously took out a full-page ad in the New York Times telling people not to buy its products in 2011. (The company’s sales jumped more than 30 percent that year.)
Since then, companies from Allbirds to Deciem have taken a similar approach, using their platform to denounce the retail event while taking full advantage of the buzz their stance generated. This week resale platform Vestiaire Collective banned ultra-fast-fashion listings and then promoted its Black Friday deals as a guilt-free opportunity to “shop sustainably.”
But can a brand really tap into the Black Friday marketing frenzy and claim to be promoting responsible consumption?
Resisting the pressure to join the discount bonanza is high-stakes, even for brands that don’t want to participate. That’s especially true now, as economic uncertainty prompts shoppers to pull back on spending. Many smaller brands said participating in the sales this year was a necessary compromise — if not a survival tactic.
Loud Bodies, a bootstrapped made-to-order womenswear label based out of Romania, usually abstains from Black Friday sales, but it’s offering discounts of up to 50 percent this year. Following months of steady decline, orders have plummeted to near-zero lately, a trend the brand chalked up to shoppers holding out for the sales.
“This is really not an encouragement to over consume, but rather a tough choice on my end to have to adhere to a tradition I highly disapprove of in order to keep the lights on and take care of my team,” founder Patricia Luiza Blaj wrote in a lengthy Instagram post.
Bigger brands have tried to navigate the tension by positioning their Black Friday activations as alternatives to the frenzy of overconsumption, following the playbook first laid out by Patagonia.
This year, for instance, Swedish slow-fashion brand Asket gutted its store of new inventory to exclusively sell secondhand pieces instead. In similar moves, London-based Raeburn is offering in-store valuations and buybacks for high-quality streetwear pieces, and B-Corp skin care brand Haeckels is showcasing small, mission-driven businesses in its retail space, in lieu of its own product.
The reality is, even the most sustainably minded fashion players are still businesses competing for consumer attention, loyalty and spend amid an increasingly crowded landscape and a dire economic outlook.
A shopping holiday like Black Friday is a great opportunity for brands to achieve that, even when they’re ostensibly railing against it.
The brand’s hyperrealistic (but fake) animal heads sparked outrage this week, highlighting the increasingly delicate balance brands must strike between provocative marketing and shifting consumer values.
Shifting weather patterns are making shopping behaviour harder to predict, adding to inventory management challenges for brands and retailers.
The company faced questions about how rabbit felt, which is made from the animal’s hairs, fit with its no-fur policy.
This week, a spoof press release claimed Adidas had appointed a co-CEO to address rights violations in its supply chain, a sign of more disruptive and confrontational tactics from advocacy groups focused on the industry.