default-output-block.skip-main
BoF Logo

The Business of Fashion

Agenda-setting intelligence, analysis and advice for the global fashion community.

Revlon Creditors Challenge 2020 Loan Transactions

The creditors in a court filing late Monday accused a separate faction of lenders of exerting enormous leverage over Revlon’s bankruptcy proceedings based on “sham” loan transactions made in 2019 and 2020.
Revlon lipstick.
Revlon creditors challenge 2020 loan transactions. (Revlon)

Some of Revlon’s creditors have asked a US bankruptcy judge in Manhattan to unwind the bankrupt cosmetic giant’s 2020 loan restructuring, saying that a group of senior lenders fleeced other creditors by improperly laying claim to the company’s valuable intellectual property assets.

The creditors, including Brigade Capital and Nuveen Asset Management, in a court filing late Monday accused a separate faction of lenders, known as the Brandco lenders, of exerting enormous leverage over Revlon’s bankruptcy proceedings based on “sham” loan transactions made in 2019 and 2020.

If successful, their challenge could eliminate the Brandco lenders’ right to claim Revlon’s brands as their exclusive collateral, reducing the Brandco lenders’ leverage in the bankruptcy.

Both lender groups participated in a $2 billion loan that Revlon used to purchase Elizabeth Arden in 2016. But the Brandco lenders, which include private equity and hedge funds such as Ares Management and Oak Hill Advisors, then loaned Revlon additional money and claimed more of Revlon’s assets as collateral, in violation of the 2016 loan agreement, according to the filing.

Revlon and an attorney for the Brandco lenders did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Ares declined to comment.

When Revlon filed for bankruptcy in June, the Brandco lenders held about $1.88 billion of Revlon’s $3.5 billion debt. They loaned the company another $975 million to fund the Chapter 11 case.

Through transactions in 2019 and 2020, Revlon transferred trademarks and other intellectual property rights associated with its beauty brands, including Elizabeth Arden, Almay and Roux, to newly created subsidiaries which took on additional, higher-priority debt than the company’s existing debts.

Those transactions allowed Revlon to borrow an additional $880 million in 2020 from the Brandco lenders, according to the complaint.

The objecting lenders previously sued the Brandco lenders, but their lawsuit was sidetracked when Revlon’s bank, Citibank, mistakenly made a $900 million payment on the 2016 loan while attempting to process a $7.8 million interest payment.

Revlon has said it is exploring a sale of the company as a potential exit from Chapter 11. The company is working to reach a preliminary restructuring agreement with its Brandco lenders by mid-November.

By Dietrich Knauth; Editors: Alexia Garamfalvi and Ed Osmond

Learn more:

What Went Wrong at Revlon

It was a slow decline for the 90-year-old company, which found itself crippled by massive debt, a pandemic, supply chain issues and growing competition from start-up brands changing beauty ideals and culture.

In This Article
Topics
Organisations

© 2021 The Business of Fashion. All rights reserved. For more information read our Terms & Conditions

The Business of Fashion

Agenda-setting intelligence, analysis and advice for the global fashion community.
CONNECT WITH US ON
State of Fashion 2023
© 2022 The Business of Fashion. All rights reserved. For more information read our Terms & Conditions and Privacy policy.
State of Fashion 2023