The Business of Fashion
Agenda-setting intelligence, analysis and advice for the global fashion community.
Agenda-setting intelligence, analysis and advice for the global fashion community.
Lululemon Athletica Inc. sued Peloton Interactive Inc. for patent infringement five days after the fitness bike company filed a pre-emptive suit against the clothing maker, as a dispute over a busted co-branding deal heats up.
Peloton pursued the deal with Lululemon in 2016 “to benefit from the popularity of Lululemon’s products and designs,” the Vancouver, British Columbia, athleticwear company said in its lawsuit Monday, filed in federal court in California.
It claimed it “supplied Peloton with some of Lululemon’s most innovative and popular athletic apparel” and let the New York firm add its own trademarks and resell the co-branded apparel through its retail outlets.
Then, earlier this year, Peloton asked to end the co-branding pact, and Lululemon stopped supplying it with merchandise, according to the lawsuit. Peloton soon announced it was starting its own line of apparel but “did not spend the time, effort, and expense to create an original product line,” Lululemon claims.
ADVERTISEMENT
“Instead, Peloton imitated several of Lululemon’s innovative designs and sold knockoffs of Lululemon’s products, claiming them as its own,” the Canadian company says in the suit. “These knockoffs include Peloton’s Strappy Bra, Cadent Laser Dot Legging, Cadent Laser Dot Bra, High Neck Bra, and Cadent Peak Bra, which collectively infringe six different Lululemon patents.”
Peloton’s suit -- filed in federal court in Manhattan on Wednesday, two days before Black Friday’s start of the holiday shopping season -- was a preemptive move to protect the workout bike company’s new athleticwear line from the complaint Lululemon had threatened to bring. The clothing maker had fired off a cease-and-desist letter to Peloton on Nov. 11.
Peloton’s lawsuit is Peloton Interactive Inc. v. Lululemon Athletica Canada Inc., 21-cv-10071, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan). Lululemon’s suit is Lululemon Athletica Canada Inc. v. Peloton Interactive Inc., 21-cv-9252, U.S. District Court, Central District of California.
Learn more:
How Lululemon Built Athleisure’s Leading Brand – Download the Case Study
As much of the fashion industry scrambled to survive the Covid-19 crisis, the activewear label’s share price rose to an all-time high. How did Lululemon come to dominate the age of athleisure, prosper through the early days of the pandemic and solidify its position as one of the world’s most powerful apparel brands?
From analysis of the global fashion and beauty industries to career and personal advice, BoF’s founder and CEO, Imran Amed, will be answering your questions on Sunday, February 18, 2024 during London Fashion Week.
The State of Fashion 2024 breaks down the 10 themes that will define the industry in the year ahead.
Imran Amed reviews the most important fashion stories of the year and shares his predictions on what this means for the industry in 2024.
After three days of inspiring talks, guests closed out BoF’s gathering for big thinkers with a black tie gala followed by an intimate performance from Rita Ora — guest starring Billy Porter.