Skip to main content
BoF Logo

The Business of Fashion

Agenda-setting intelligence, analysis and advice for the global fashion community.

Who’s Behind the Flurry of Influencer-Backed Beauty Brands?

A handful of private label companies — with a focus on speed, agility and new marketing models — are making a lucrative business of birthing influencer-backed beauty brands.
Source: Instagram (@kathleenlights, @kyliejenner, @orlandopita) and Hatch
  • Hayley Phelan

NEW YORK, United States — Last week in SoHo, the streets were unusually chaotic and crowded as hundreds of people — many of them teenagers — lined up outside of 27 Mercer Street. Some had been waiting in line — in the frigid February temperatures — for nearly 48 hours; the crowd was so diffuse and excitable that police had set up barricades. The reason for the pilgrimage? Kylie Jenner's Pop-Up Shop, which promised, among other things like graphic hoodies, the chance to buy items from her frequently sold-out Kylie Cosmetics line. Two years after launching the brand, demand for the products — which include Kyshadow and Lip Kits — is as high as ever.

The rise of social media has provided new opportunity for niche beauty brands. Digital influencers, like Jenner, have been quick to capitalise. Indeed, it seems every other month a beauty concept is announced with a famous (or at least Instagram-famous) name attached. But who is making all this stuff? More often than not it’s the same few private label companies, including Seed Beauty, Hatch Beauty, Maesa Group and Kendo Brands, who — with a focus on speed, agility and new marketing models — are making a lucrative business out of building influencer-backed brands from the ground up.

“You’re going to see more and more of these companies come up as these large conglomerates that don’t really stand for anything start to get dismantled, and we’ll see a big increase in niche brands that don’t really need a lot to survive,” says Connor Begley, co-founder of Tribe Dynamics, a marketing technology firm. Tribe tracks and measures content creation and engagement across 50,000 beauty, fashion and lifestyle influencers using a metric called Earned Media Value (EMV). EMV quantifies the value of social word-of-mouth among digital content creators who influence purchasing decisions — and according to Tribe it can predict future revenue growth and market share. It should come as no surprise that topping Tribe’s list of high-growth celebrity or influencer created brands, with a year over year EMV growth of 620.87 percent, is Kylie Cosmetics, the breakaway success founded by Kylie Jenner.

Kylie Cosmetics is the gold standard in celebrity or influencer-backed beauty brands; if there was ever any doubt about the selling power of such brands, Kylie Cosmetics quickly put that to bed. The brand launched in November 2015 with a series of Lip Kits, priced at $26 each, which sold out in seconds, some winding up on eBay for close to $300. In the midst of its stratospheric success, beauty fanatics and industry insiders almost immediately began speculating about who was manufacturing the offering. But it wasn’t until May 2016 that the company behind the venture was revealed: Seed Beauty, an Oxnard, California-based company founded in 2014 by brother and sister team John and Laura Nelson. In addition to Kylie Cosmetics, Seed also manufacturers Colourpop, a beauty brand that frequently collaborates with influencers.


We'll see a big increase in niche brands that don't really need a lot to survive.

“People would be shocked at how hands on Kylie is,” says Laura Nelson. “We are here strictly to actualise and support her vision, and obviously to do the insane business operations side of things, the fulfilment. Which is no small task with a brand like that.”

The partnership with Jenner has been a boon to say the least, but Seed’s unique business model also gives them an edge on competitors. “Traditionally the product development process is filled with starts and stops and delays while you wait for feedback,” says Nelson, who has over 15 years of experience in the business, many of which was spent running Spatz Labs, a global supplier to the makeup industry owned by her family. “At Seed, we believe in a really fluid development process where that feedback is happening in real time.”

The company pays close attention to its e-commerce and social media platforms to glean near-immediate consumer insight. “We do everything under one roof, from concept, packaging, development; from making the product all the way through launch to shipping and fulfilment, and that allows us to understand what the consumer is looking for and asking,” she says. That kind of vertical integration allows Seed to align resources and development at the pace set by a consumer who is demanding newer and better products at ever-increasing speed.


The Kylie Cosmetics pop-up in New York | Source: Instagram/Kylie Jenner

According to Nelson, Seed can take a product from concept to consumer in just five days. Last year, for example, Seed was able to action on an idea with one of its collaborators, beauty YouTuber KathleenLights, in a matter of days. “Kathleen had a successful Lippie Stix with [Colourpop] called Lumière and people were asking for the colour to come in an ultra-matte,” says Nelson. “Five days before her birthday last year, she was coming out to LA and we say, ‘Hey what we should do for your birthday is we should launch Lumière in ultra-matte.’ So we made it in the lab, gave her a couple of options, revised it and updated it and within five days we went from idea to actually launching on her birthday and being able to ship to consumers.”

Like Seed, Hatch Beauty is also in the business of building and launching new beauty concepts, often in partnership with influencers or celebrities. Hatch’s portfolio includes haircare by celebrity hairstylist Orlando Pita, makeup by celebrity makeup artist Kristofer Buckle and a line of nail products from Jenna Hipp, the “green celebrity manicurist.”

“Hatch can take an idea for a completely new brand and get it on shelves in less than a year, from soup to nuts,” says Hatch president Michael Sampson. “You have to have a model where you can parallel path, so retail strategy, product development, innovation are all happening at the same time. It’s all hands on deck, all pedal to the metal, all at once, to get to the end goal of this consumer, who loves discovery.”

If Hatch and Seed handle the nuts and bolts, it’s influencers that bring the secret sauce: authenticity. “Brand authenticity is the buzzword,” says Sampson. “Every brand has its own DNA and every consumer has its own DNA. To tap into that, you really have to have somebody behind the product that lives and breathes it every day.”


This isn’t just clever marketing (though it is certainly that, too). “The reason why so many of these product lines are successful is that a lot of these influencers or celebrities genuinely know a lot about beauty products,” says Tribe’s Begley. “They’re obsessed with them and they usually have a pretty good idea about what what kind of product they want to make.”

Begley points to Estée Lauder's partnership with Kendall Jenner as an example of how, without this genuine interest in the product, collaborations can fall flat. "It didn't work that well because Kendall openly tells her fans she doesn't like cosmetics," he says. Indeed, many of the beauty industry's mega companies are still operating a legacy model whereby a famous name is signed to be the face of a product line without much (or any) creative input.

But even when these companies take a more collaborative approach — as with Michelle Phan’s Em cosmetic line, produced by L’Oréal — they have to fight harder to be perceived as authentic. “Em cosmetics didn’t work for a lot of reasons, but one is that it was really seen as being a part of L’Oréal, and I think that lost credibility among consumers,” says Begley. Meanwhile, by keeping a low profile, and releasing products under their own distinct brand identities, private label companies like Seed and Hatch have figured out how to do big business without feeling inauthentic.

Importantly, they’ve also learned the art of listening to a new kind of hyper-engaged, hyper-informed consumer. “Ten, maybe 20 years ago brands could speak to large audiences with billboards and magazines and say, we are the best, and if you said it loud enough and long enough people will try the product,” says Sampson. “Now, it’s the consumer that says, no, I’ll tell you if you’re best. It used to be a linear pathway from brand to retailer to consumer. Now it’s turned into a triangle with the consumer in the middle. The power of the consumer is so loud that the minute you’re no longer true to what you say it hits like wildfire. If you say you’re building a brand with person X you better be building a brand with person X.”

“We’re not looking to hire faces or somebody just to represent,” adds Nelson. “We’re really looking to partner with people with a strong creative vision that want to bring that to life.” Otherwise, the products simply won’t pass the sniff test with beauty fanatics.

But how are these partnerships structured — and how well do influencers fare? That’s often where entities like Digital Brand Products, an offshoot of Digital Brand Architects, a digital talent management agency, are involved. “Usually we start with the influencer, they come to us and say ‘Hey, I have this beauty or apparel idea that I’m really passionate about creating and selling to my followers,’” says Daniel Landver, CEO of Digital Brand Products. “We take in what they’re saying and walk them through the process and the options — do we want a license deal, a partnership deal or do we want to go direct-to-consumer and not partner with a retailer.”

According to Hatch’s Sampson and Seed’s Nelson, both companies prefer partnership deals. “Each deal is structured differently based on what we’re trying to accomplish,” says Nelson. “We believe it’s important to go into everything with elements of partnerships. Those elements might vary, but generally we want our partners to enjoy the upside and have ownership.” Nelson, who declined to disclose specific numbers, says the company stays away from one-time payments and up-front fees as it feels “too transactional.” Instead, most of Seed’s partnerships involve some form of equity and profit sharing.


The power of the consumer is so loud that the minute you're no longer true to what you say it hits like wildfire.

According to Sampson, Hatch expects their partners to make a genuine contribution to the team. “Ours is not a license agreement, it’s a partnership and we want to make sure these individuals have their stamp on it,” says Sampson. “The number one thing we look at when we partner with someone is, do they actually live up to what they say. We want to make sure they’ll want to be involved and give input and truly have a belief system.”

Of course licensing deals do come into play — and sometimes companies can take advantage of an influencer’s relative inexperience in business. “It’s just like anything else when you’re the new artist in town and your first record deal really sucks,” says Begley. “But then you make it big and you negotiate something better for your second record and you start making money. Once influencers can show the impact on business, they’re in the driver’s seat.”

“Deals don’t always work out well for the influencer, but I don’t know if I would say they are taken advantage of,” says Landver, who said that a license deal would have to be at least six figures or above for an established influencer to devote time and energy to it “Building a business is really hard and takes a lot of energy and a lot of times outsourced manufacturers are in it for a quick buck not building the brand.”

Landver, however, believes that an influencer’s clout can be leveraged for long-term success — which is why Digital Brand Products is in the process of closing a round of investment in order to incubate and build brands directly in-house. “Sometimes third-party manufacturers don’t execute at a level that’s strategic over a long period of time,” says Landver. “The old model is based on home-runs. We’re not looking at it that way. We’re looking at building a viable brand value over a longer period of time.”

Landver believes that the next big lifestyle brand—the next Tory Burch or Martha Stewart, say — will be founded by an influencer. Or several, actually. "As opposed to looking at one big hundred million-dollar brand, we're looking at building many ten million dollar brands," says Landver. "I say longtail five times a day. The future is going to be many more small brands focused on smaller segments."

“What’s great about an incubator is you can create a scaleable model where you launch different brands with different belief systems within one portfolio,” adds Sampson. “If Hatch is an umbrella of a multitude of different brands then you can continue to stay interesting and relevant. That’s where incubators have a leg up because you can cater to different markets, and play in every segment and retail channel.” Indeed, when an influencer’s star begins to fade, incubators can easily pivot — and move onto the next.

Related Articles:

Kendall vs Kylie: Whose Cosmetics Venture Is Winning Over Gen Z?Opens in new window ]

Behind the Business of Beauty DupesOpens in new window ]

© 2024 The Business of Fashion. All rights reserved. For more information read our Terms & Conditions

More from Beauty
Analysis and advice on the fast-evolving beauty business.
view more

Subscribe to the BoF Daily Digest

The essential daily round-up of fashion news, analysis, and breaking news alerts.

The Business of Fashion

Agenda-setting intelligence, analysis and advice for the global fashion community.
© 2024 The Business of Fashion. All rights reserved. For more information read our Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy, Cookie Policy and Accessibility Statement.